In this paper, briefly describe key features of the case, present your analysis, and consider possible objections and/or alternatives suggested by your classmates and/or instructor. The paper should reflect your considered judgement on the issue, that is, your analysis of what happened or should have happened after: (a) thinking carefully about it on your own (the presentation) and (b) discussing it with peers (the feedback session).
Main Moral Issues Identified- Identifies main moral issues and problems. Identifies main stakeholders (e.g., who is responsible).
Main Possible Solutions Identified- Identifies main possible solutions and related problems and issues. Solutions identified are specific and realistic.
Defends One Solution- Defends one solution as morally best. Clearly indicates best solution. Justifies decision in a logical manner, clearly drawing on relevant moral concepts and standards. Does not overlook any obvious counter-examples or counter-arguments.
Justifies Rejection of Other Solutions- Justifies decision to reject other possible solutions. Decisions logical and clearly based on relevant moral concepts and standards. Does not overlook any obvious counter-examples or counter-arguments.
Writing Style and Mechanics- Written presentation is sound. Uses language and style appropriate for a college writing assignment. No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation problems. Organization of paper aids in comprehension of overall case analysis. Easy for attentive reader to follow